The start of 2026 has brought a political earthquake to the Philippines that few could have predicted, as the veteran political kingmaker and former Ilocos Sur Governor, Luis “Chavit” Singson, has officially broken ties with the administration of President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.

In a high-stakes press conference that has left Malacañang scrambling for a response, Singson launched a series of blistering allegations, characterizing the President as the “mastermind” behind a massive corruption scandal involving the nation’s flood control projects.

This development is not merely a verbal spat between former allies; it represents a calculated and potentially destabilizing move to mobilize the Filipino people through what Singson calls a “One-Time, Big-Time” rally and a direct march to the gates of Malacañang.

The timing of Singson’s announcement is as symbolic as it is strategic. As the nation approaches the 40th anniversary of the 1986 People Power Revolution that ousted the elder Marcos, Singson pointed out a chilling historical parallel.

He noted that President Bongbong Marcos is currently 68 years old—the exact same age his father was when he was forced out of the palace.

Singson’s rhetoric suggests that the “cycle of history” is repeating itself, driven by what he describes as unprecedented levels of “graft and corruption” that have pushed the Philippines into a perilous economic state.

At the core of Singson’s grievance is the “flood control scandal,” a long-standing issue involving billions of pesos in infrastructure projects that many claim are either substandard or entirely non-existent—so-called “ghost projects.” Singson went a step further than previous critics by explicitly naming the President and former Speaker Martin Romualdez as the architects of this system.

He challenged them both to a live, televised debate in front of the media, stating that he is willing to go to Malacañang alone to confront them with the evidence. Singson alleged that while the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) has been investigating projects in other regions, it has conspicuously ignored the President’s own stronghold in Ilocos Norte, where he claims the most egregious anomalies exist.

Singson’s approach to these revelations is a masterclass in modern political warfare and legal navigation. During the press conference, he utilized AI-generated video presentations to convey his message, though he was transparent about the technology used, insisting that the core message remained factual. More importantly, Singson appeared to be playing a sophisticated legal game with the authorities.

When journalists asked if he was calling for the President’s resignation—a statement that could lead to charges of “Inciting to Sedition” under Article 142 of the Revised Penal Code—Singson carefully deflected. He maintained that he was simply exposing corruption and calling for a rally, often telling reporters, “You said that, not me,” when the word “resign” was mentioned. This calculated caution suggests that Singson is well-prepared for a long-term legal and political battle.

The financial figures presented by Singson were equally alarming. He claimed that the Philippines is currently drowning in 17 trillion pesos of national debt, with 2 trillion pesos being paid out annually just to cover interest and principal. He warned that the economy is on the brink of collapse and that the current administration’s spending habits are unsustainable.

This economic warning was paired with an open letter to the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Chief of Staff, General Romeo Brawner Jr. In this letter, Singson argued that the true enemy of the state is not an external threat like China, but rather the “corrupt politicians” within the government who are bleeding the nation dry.

By framing corruption as a national security issue, Singson is clearly attempting to appeal to the patriotic sentiments of the military and the youth.

Singson also brought forward the names of potential witnesses who could provide the “receipts” for his allegations. He mentioned Sarah Discaya and Orly Gotesa as highly credible witnesses against the President. He specifically alleged that Gotesa is being “hidden” by former Speaker Martin Romualdez to prevent them from speaking out.

The inclusion of these names suggests that Singson is not just throwing blind accusations but is positioning himself as the head of a coordinated effort to dismantle the administration’s infrastructure narrative.

The reaction from the public and the youth is what Singson is counting on most. He appealed to religious organizations and various sectors of society to join his “One-Time, Big-Time” rally, emphasizing that the movement should happen “as soon as possible” (ASAP).

He argued that the youth, in particular, must wake up to the reality that their future is being sold off through massive debts and failed infrastructure. While Malacañang and the ICI have yet to issue an official comment on these specific allegations, the tension in the capital is palpable.

Critics of Singson might view this as a desperate move from a politician who has been sidelined, or as a strategic pivot to protect his own interests. However, Singson’s confidence—demonstrated by his willingness to be jailed if proven wrong—has resonated with a segment of the population that is increasingly frustrated with the rising cost of living and reports of government waste. He has positioned himself as a man with nothing left to lose, a dangerous position for any incumbent administration to handle.

As the Philippines enters the second month of 2026, the question is no longer whether there will be a confrontation, but how Malacañang will choose to address it. A refusal to debate could be seen as a sign of weakness or guilt, while a direct confrontation could give Singson the very platform he needs to further his cause.

Regardless of the outcome, Chavit Singson has successfully reignited a national conversation about transparency, the limits of executive power, and the true state of the Philippine economy. The “One-Time, Big-Time” rally looms over the administration like a gathering storm, and the march to Malacañang may very well determine the course of Philippine history for the next decade.